Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:3536

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 23:03, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr6:113433522..113433565,+p1@Creld1
Mm9::chr9:106588199..106588221,-p3@Tex264
Mm9::chr9:106588223..106588292,-p1@Tex264


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
nervous system2.85e-1875
central nervous system1.24e-1773
ectoderm-derived structure2.28e-1795
ectoderm2.28e-1795
presumptive ectoderm2.28e-1795
anatomical conduit6.26e-16122
tube2.50e-14114
regional part of nervous system9.74e-1454
neural tube5.13e-1352
neural rod5.13e-1352
future spinal cord5.13e-1352
neural keel5.13e-1352
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest1.27e-1192
brain2.47e-1147
future brain2.47e-1147
neurectoderm5.90e-1164
neural plate5.90e-1164
presumptive neural plate5.90e-1164
regional part of brain6.68e-1146
ecto-epithelium1.13e-1073
gray matter2.62e-1034
anterior neural tube1.04e-0840
brain grey matter1.68e-0829
regional part of telencephalon1.68e-0829
telencephalon1.68e-0829
regional part of forebrain2.01e-0839
forebrain2.01e-0839
future forebrain2.01e-0839
regional part of cerebral cortex1.56e-0717
pre-chordal neural plate3.13e-0749
cerebral cortex9.97e-0721
cerebral hemisphere9.97e-0721
pallium9.97e-0721


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}