Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3941

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:31, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3941_lung_synovial_testis_small_large_gall_maxillary



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr1:223101757..223101776,+p3@DISP1
Hg19::chr1:223101804..223101818,+p5@DISP1
Hg19::chr1:223101832..223101847,+p4@DISP1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism2.62e-44114
organ system subdivision4.86e-17223
neural tube7.87e-1756
neural rod7.87e-1756
future spinal cord7.87e-1756
neural keel7.87e-1756
regional part of nervous system3.66e-1553
regional part of brain3.66e-1553
central nervous system8.27e-1581
nervous system4.20e-1389
neurectoderm7.34e-1386
brain2.80e-1268
future brain2.80e-1268
regional part of forebrain1.23e-1141
forebrain1.23e-1141
anterior neural tube1.23e-1141
future forebrain1.23e-1141
neural plate1.38e-1182
presumptive neural plate1.38e-1182
multi-tissue structure2.10e-11342
telencephalon3.01e-1134
brain grey matter3.81e-1134
gray matter3.81e-1134
anatomical cluster1.84e-10373
cerebral hemisphere3.40e-1032
regional part of telencephalon4.03e-1032
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest9.31e-10132
larynx2.22e-089
ecto-epithelium3.33e-08104
neural nucleus5.94e-089
nucleus of brain5.94e-089
regional part of cerebral cortex2.97e-0722
upper respiratory tract3.45e-0719
subdivision of digestive tract4.29e-07118
neocortex4.54e-0720
tube5.01e-07192
organ part5.40e-07218
organ segment5.97e-0798
telencephalic nucleus7.21e-077


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CTCF#1066435.360256373075030.0064925092527670.0279651574978238
FOXA1#3169311.08141974938550.000734755275698670.00581650164774451
MAX#414936.452555509007120.003721913834265510.0186674810995944
NANOG#79923329.24477848101273.99627955670032e-050.000737919803080313
RAD21#5885310.35503389545630.0009004912073565420.00664451047089938
SETDB1#9869340.32002617801051.52461559299059e-050.000358867090187839
TRIM28#10155318.59052504526250.0001555969297255280.00197141668610996
ZNF263#1012738.221841637010680.001799043925565870.0109512355622879



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.