Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4070

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:31, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4070_placenta_spinal_left_skeletal_lung_Skeletal_colon



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr21:27011975..27012064,+p1@JAM2
Hg19::chr21:27012071..27012091,+p9@JAM2
Hg19::chr21:27012101..27012112,+p12@JAM2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism1.82e-56114
nervous system1.11e-3489
central nervous system5.91e-3481
neural tube8.14e-3456
neural rod8.14e-3456
future spinal cord8.14e-3456
neural keel8.14e-3456
neural plate7.16e-3382
presumptive neural plate7.16e-3382
regional part of nervous system3.24e-3153
regional part of brain3.24e-3153
neurectoderm3.80e-3086
brain9.41e-2868
future brain9.41e-2868
regional part of forebrain1.83e-2641
forebrain1.83e-2641
anterior neural tube1.83e-2641
future forebrain1.83e-2641
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest1.91e-24132
pre-chordal neural plate9.78e-2461
ecto-epithelium5.82e-23104
ectoderm-derived structure8.39e-23171
ectoderm8.39e-23171
presumptive ectoderm8.39e-23171
telencephalon2.18e-2134
brain grey matter3.48e-2134
gray matter3.48e-2134
cerebral hemisphere3.75e-2032
regional part of telencephalon6.55e-2032
organ system subdivision2.06e-19223
cerebral cortex9.99e-1625
pallium9.99e-1625
regional part of cerebral cortex4.37e-1422
anatomical cluster5.75e-14373
neocortex9.22e-1320
organ part4.97e-12218
multi-tissue structure5.22e-10342
posterior neural tube1.74e-0815
chordal neural plate1.74e-0815
multi-cellular organism1.61e-07656
anatomical conduit2.00e-07240
tube3.31e-07192
neural nucleus6.37e-079
nucleus of brain6.37e-079
basal ganglion6.74e-079
nuclear complex of neuraxis6.74e-079
aggregate regional part of brain6.74e-079
collection of basal ganglia6.74e-079
cerebral subcortex6.74e-079
segmental subdivision of nervous system7.37e-0713


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CTCF#1066435.360256373075030.0064925092527670.0279951766586736
EBF1#187938.9064668465690.00141523283560980.00916282326689308
EGR1#195834.988179094810140.008056488137383440.0321186229178986
ELF1#199734.258097958807540.01295179875054610.0463117265717709
NFKB1#479035.488063424193840.006049381815655430.0269961708945536
RAD21#5885310.35503389545630.0009004912073565420.00665250061576783
SMC3#9126315.04493284493280.0002935825420371870.00309617965342035
YY1#752834.911170749853860.008441455341808260.0329897154034992



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.