Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4413

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:43, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4413_Preadipocyte_optic_globus_thalamus_somatostatinoma_spinal_substantia



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr4:41362776..41362792,+p2@LIMCH1
Hg19::chr4:41362796..41362841,+p1@LIMCH1
Hg19::chr4:41362846..41362859,+p5@LIMCH1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism3.57e-32114
anatomical cluster9.92e-30373
neural tube2.39e-2756
neural rod2.39e-2756
future spinal cord2.39e-2756
neural keel2.39e-2756
anatomical conduit3.55e-27240
tube7.20e-27192
regional part of nervous system1.35e-2553
regional part of brain1.35e-2553
central nervous system2.43e-2381
organ system subdivision4.41e-23223
nervous system6.84e-2389
neural plate1.54e-2282
presumptive neural plate1.54e-2282
brain1.60e-2268
future brain1.60e-2268
regional part of forebrain3.95e-2241
forebrain3.95e-2241
anterior neural tube3.95e-2241
future forebrain3.95e-2241
neurectoderm7.39e-2286
multi-tissue structure1.67e-20342
telencephalon1.81e-1934
brain grey matter1.91e-1934
gray matter1.91e-1934
regional part of telencephalon4.06e-1832
cerebral hemisphere4.48e-1832
epithelium8.97e-18306
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest7.51e-17132
cell layer9.27e-17309
pre-chordal neural plate9.79e-1761
multi-cellular organism9.81e-16656
organ part3.06e-14218
cerebral cortex4.50e-1425
pallium4.50e-1425
ecto-epithelium2.77e-13104
regional part of cerebral cortex3.36e-1322
anatomical system2.89e-12624
anatomical group5.11e-12625
neocortex5.27e-1220
ectoderm-derived structure1.53e-11171
ectoderm1.53e-11171
presumptive ectoderm1.53e-11171
organ1.95e-09503
embryo1.21e-08592
developing anatomical structure8.49e-08581
germ layer9.83e-08560
germ layer / neural crest9.83e-08560
embryonic tissue9.83e-08560
presumptive structure9.83e-08560
germ layer / neural crest derived structure9.83e-08560
epiblast (generic)9.83e-08560
embryonic structure1.58e-07564
neural nucleus7.07e-079
nucleus of brain7.07e-079
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
cell type cancer3.52e-07143


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0326929168182446
ZNF263#1012738.221841637010680.001799043925565870.0109819597020384



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.