Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1168: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Coexpression_clusters
{
|full_id=C1168_cerebellum_amygdala_hippocampus_occipital_medial_parietal_pineal
 

Latest revision as of 11:39, 17 September 2013


Full id: C1168_cerebellum_amygdala_hippocampus_occipital_medial_parietal_pineal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr12:175930..175960,+p2@IQSEC3
Hg19::chr16:29826201..29826227,+p@chr16:29826201..29826227
+
Hg19::chr16:58546898..58546921,+p@chr16:58546898..58546921
+
Hg19::chr6:31512426..31512437,-p@chr6:31512426..31512437
-
Hg19::chr6:31512450..31512515,-p@chr6:31512450..31512515
-
Hg19::chrX:101906316..101906354,+p2@GPRASP1
Hg19::chrX:75651278..75651282,+p1@AF086039


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0016010dystrophin-associated glycoprotein complex0.0398091642367653
GO:0005086ARF guanyl-nucleotide exchange factor activity0.0398091642367653
GO:0030425dendrite0.0398091642367653
GO:0005605basal lamina0.0398091642367653
GO:0048471perinuclear region of cytoplasm0.0398091642367653
GO:0005604basement membrane0.0398091642367653
GO:0043005neuron projection0.0398091642367653
GO:0032011ARF protein signal transduction0.0398091642367653
GO:0032012regulation of ARF protein signal transduction0.0398091642367653



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
neural tube5.77e-10156
neural rod5.77e-10156
future spinal cord5.77e-10156
neural keel5.77e-10156
regional part of nervous system5.46e-9453
regional part of brain5.46e-9453
central nervous system4.94e-8481
brain3.15e-8068
future brain3.15e-8068
nervous system5.41e-8089
regional part of forebrain4.08e-7841
forebrain4.08e-7841
anterior neural tube4.08e-7841
future forebrain4.08e-7841
neural plate9.98e-7182
presumptive neural plate9.98e-7182
neurectoderm8.10e-6786
brain grey matter2.24e-6634
gray matter2.24e-6634
telencephalon9.52e-6634
cerebral hemisphere1.33e-6132
regional part of telencephalon1.67e-6132
adult organism4.98e-54114
ecto-epithelium6.39e-53104
pre-chordal neural plate3.77e-5261
regional part of cerebral cortex4.58e-5222
neocortex4.70e-4720
cerebral cortex2.82e-4525
pallium2.82e-4525
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest2.49e-44132
ectoderm-derived structure3.51e-38171
ectoderm3.51e-38171
presumptive ectoderm3.51e-38171
organ system subdivision2.37e-29223
tube1.15e-24192
posterior neural tube9.32e-2315
chordal neural plate9.32e-2315
basal ganglion1.21e-229
nuclear complex of neuraxis1.21e-229
aggregate regional part of brain1.21e-229
collection of basal ganglia1.21e-229
cerebral subcortex1.21e-229
neural nucleus2.06e-229
nucleus of brain2.06e-229
anatomical conduit6.28e-18240
telencephalic nucleus1.15e-177
segmental subdivision of hindbrain1.56e-1612
hindbrain1.56e-1612
presumptive hindbrain1.56e-1612
gyrus3.68e-166
anatomical cluster8.24e-16373
segmental subdivision of nervous system4.13e-1513
brainstem6.22e-156
limbic system7.62e-145
occipital lobe8.24e-145
parietal lobe1.02e-135
temporal lobe1.13e-136
diencephalon2.43e-137
future diencephalon2.43e-137
epithelium8.03e-12306
cell layer1.41e-11309
corpus striatum3.38e-114
striatum3.38e-114
ventral part of telencephalon3.38e-114
future corpus striatum3.38e-114
regional part of diencephalon4.49e-114
regional part of metencephalon1.16e-109
metencephalon1.16e-109
future metencephalon1.16e-109
organ part3.82e-10218
multi-tissue structure1.01e-09342
caudate-putamen5.82e-093
dorsal striatum5.82e-093
frontal cortex7.18e-093
pons1.24e-083
spinal cord3.42e-083
dorsal region element3.42e-083
dorsum3.42e-083
medulla oblongata5.48e-083
myelencephalon5.48e-083
future myelencephalon5.48e-083
middle temporal gyrus9.47e-072


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.110456
MA0004.10.502801
MA0006.10.341337
MA0007.10.483857
MA0009.10.973289
MA0014.10.912418
MA0017.10.991615
MA0019.10.652951
MA0024.10.867125
MA0025.11.10816
MA0027.12.59001
MA0028.10.35747
MA0029.10.886702
MA0030.10.875089
MA0031.10.809638
MA0038.10.60704
MA0040.10.892629
MA0041.10.521615
MA0042.10.48922
MA0043.10.973609
MA0046.10.962263
MA0048.10.120314
MA0050.10.490116
MA0051.10.602745
MA0052.10.896548
MA0055.10.158296
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.744639
MA0058.10.406232
MA0059.11.04442
MA0060.10.224688
MA0061.10.198335
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.607474
MA0067.11.29359
MA0068.10.488375
MA0069.10.958358
MA0070.10.947018
MA0071.10.567661
MA0072.10.942461
MA0073.14.03024
MA0074.10.60198
MA0076.10.422297
MA0077.10.934645
MA0078.10.703614
MA0081.10.405093
MA0083.10.980893
MA0084.11.48179
MA0087.10.939982
MA0088.10.252594
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.436918
MA0091.10.505453
MA0092.10.467172
MA0093.10.344385
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.621149
MA0101.10.347695
MA0103.10.332048
MA0105.10.104569
MA0106.10.648997
MA0107.10.274127
MA0108.20.806528
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.45062
MA0113.10.665691
MA0114.10.269076
MA0115.11.21667
MA0116.10.760835
MA0117.11.01134
MA0119.10.388712
MA0122.11.03753
MA0124.11.17486
MA0125.11.0901
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.722072
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.00402
MA0136.10.614215
MA0139.10.186511
MA0140.10.564957
MA0141.10.403171
MA0142.10.777365
MA0143.10.66587
MA0144.10.254954
MA0145.10.581146
MA0146.10.324987
MA0147.10.281049
MA0148.10.528066
MA0149.10.555119
MA0062.20.193221
MA0035.20.564239
MA0039.20.854285
MA0138.20.704862
MA0002.20.611548
MA0137.20.95459
MA0104.20.223944
MA0047.20.636643
MA0112.20.0758925
MA0065.20.282161
MA0150.10.430951
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.571637
MA0153.11.07307
MA0154.10.335384
MA0155.10.250175
MA0156.10.36627
MA0157.10.749547
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.281681
MA0160.10.543522
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.485816
MA0163.10.0765396
MA0164.10.678332
MA0080.20.344472
MA0018.20.650405
MA0099.20.572
MA0079.22.67046
MA0102.21.51913
MA0258.10.245543
MA0259.10.289405
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.