Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2201

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 12:11, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2201_medulla_globus_hippocampus_thalamus_occipital_amygdala_locus



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr12:21680559..21680570,+p15@C12orf39
Hg19::chr9:87429287..87429322,+p13@NTRK2
Hg19::chr9:87429359..87429371,+p39@NTRK2
Hg19::chr9:87430449..87430453,+p29@NTRK2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0043121neurotrophin binding0.0170718784065629



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
neural tube1.68e-7356
neural rod1.68e-7356
future spinal cord1.68e-7356
neural keel1.68e-7356
regional part of nervous system4.68e-6853
regional part of brain4.68e-6853
neural plate9.32e-6382
presumptive neural plate9.32e-6382
adult organism1.01e-62114
neurectoderm4.08e-6186
regional part of forebrain7.93e-5741
forebrain7.93e-5741
anterior neural tube7.93e-5741
future forebrain7.93e-5741
central nervous system1.40e-5681
brain1.85e-5668
future brain1.85e-5668
brain grey matter5.46e-5234
gray matter5.46e-5234
telencephalon1.86e-5134
nervous system2.71e-4989
regional part of telencephalon3.32e-4832
cerebral hemisphere6.47e-4832
ecto-epithelium1.26e-47104
pre-chordal neural plate7.56e-4561
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest1.60e-44132
regional part of cerebral cortex6.37e-3922
cerebral cortex2.38e-3625
pallium2.38e-3625
ectoderm-derived structure1.80e-35171
ectoderm1.80e-35171
presumptive ectoderm1.80e-35171
neocortex3.73e-3520
organ system subdivision6.32e-20223
posterior neural tube4.34e-1715
chordal neural plate4.34e-1715
basal ganglion5.35e-179
nuclear complex of neuraxis5.35e-179
aggregate regional part of brain5.35e-179
collection of basal ganglia5.35e-179
cerebral subcortex5.35e-179
neural nucleus5.98e-179
nucleus of brain5.98e-179
tube3.23e-16192
organ part3.70e-15218
anatomical cluster4.14e-14373
anatomical conduit1.15e-13240
telencephalic nucleus2.92e-137
temporal lobe5.44e-136
multi-tissue structure1.34e-12342
brainstem2.59e-126
segmental subdivision of hindbrain3.14e-1212
hindbrain3.14e-1212
presumptive hindbrain3.14e-1212
gyrus2.21e-116
segmental subdivision of nervous system4.06e-1113
epithelium4.44e-11306
cell layer8.42e-11309
limbic system1.34e-105
occipital lobe1.25e-095
parietal lobe1.80e-095
regional part of diencephalon2.34e-084
corpus striatum9.38e-084
striatum9.38e-084
ventral part of telencephalon9.38e-084
future corpus striatum9.38e-084
organ1.19e-07503
regional part of metencephalon1.65e-079
metencephalon1.65e-079
future metencephalon1.65e-079
diencephalon4.25e-077
future diencephalon4.25e-077
pons5.31e-073
medulla oblongata5.85e-073
myelencephalon5.85e-073
future myelencephalon5.85e-073
spinal cord7.81e-073
dorsal region element7.81e-073
dorsum7.81e-073
embryo9.47e-07592


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.